WELCOME TO ALADAR (ALI) STOLMAR'S HOME PAGE!

If you have asked the question: - "Why does the speed of light appear to be constant in the vacuum and why does it appear to be a speed limit for everything?" - then you are in the right place!

CRITIC OF TODAY’S PHYSICS

Seems everyone avoids the following basic questions:
1. Why do we find these elements everywhere in the Universe?
2. Why do these elements' nuclei have these masses?
3. Why do they show these proportions in their amounts, abundance?
4. Why do they have different affinity to the thermal neutrons?

I found one common answer to these questions: Because of what they are built from.

It defines the how can the nuclei - atoms - form and that in turn defines their stability which translates to their abundance, results in the - "mysterious" by the current state of academia - "empirical mass defects" and - as the evaluation of all isotopes shows - defines the affinity to the neutron.

The proposed constructing elements are collision events of the elements of an underlying substance. The collision defines a pattern of collisions as regularity requirement and these patterns define the number of elements in a shell of an overlapping shell structure. When the number of elements is calculated from the atomic weight data - using the transition of 27 elements equals to one electron's rest mass - the answers to all four of the above questions just pop out naturally.

1. Why do we find these elements everywhere in the Universe?
Because the collision events are the same constructing elements everywhere and the transition to a stabile structure occurs at the Hydrogen and neutron - shell number six - and the structure becomes too soft, there are no more anchoring elements after Bismuth even the shell #10 only filled 3/4 and a small stability region is found only near a regular portion of this shell (Thorium and Uranium) after that. The missing of nuclei with A = 5 atomic mass numbers and with A = 8 atomic mass numbers is explained by the fact that the same shell structure results in a smooth, bold surface for the alpha particle, He4 nuclei - it also explains the alpha decay and reactions resulting it - as the closing element of shell number 7.


2. Why do these elements' nuclei have these masses?
Because the structure allows only these configurations, the anchoring on the underlying shell structure causes these masses.


3. Why do they show these proportions in their amounts, abundance?
Because the more regular is a construction the more likely that it will survive and will be the final product of fissions, decays and reactions. The most abundant elements - the abundance data is shown on the Figures - are at the closing of shells or at regular portions of the shells.  Hydrogen, Helium and Oxygen are the closing elements of shells 6, 7 and 8 the shell number 9 is the last closed shell and the Zn64 and Ni64 are the closing isotopes - which were identified as the underlying structure for the heavier nuclei. The higher abundance of Iron at the 5/6 of shell number 9 correlate to the fact that the shell # 10 is a too soft structure, overweight if you need an analogy.

4. Why do they have different affinity to the thermal neutrons?
Because the numbers of protruding elements are different on their surfaces. Surprisingly these numbers are indicated by the atomic weight data. At the next link you can find all the elements neutron absorption cross section in correlation with the number of protruding elements, calculated from the atomic weight data.

Composite atom: There are no Neutrons and Protons in the nuclei, but each nucleus is an individual unique object, built from the same elementary building blocks. Also the electrons do not orbit around the nucleus, but surround it, enclose it into their sphere(s). There is a direct communication between the elements of electrons and the elements of the nucleus. The nuclei can reconstruct their electron shells in the event that they lost it due to outside forces.

Expanding Universe and Big Bang: The Hubble red shift is an indication of fatigue of constructing elements and not of a movement. The Universe just exists, does not expand and there was no Big Bang. The excess red-shift observed in the Pioneer 10 Doppler measurements, background infrared radiation and the Cosmic Microwave Background radiation – with the superimposed Doppler effect from the Earth’s motion - proves it.

Black holes: There are no black holes.

These statements are based on the realization of our limitations and the deducted from it Stolmar Field and Shell theories.

Clicking on the subjects you may jump from one to the other, but for a first time visitor it is advisable to follow the order left to right.

Physic's subject , Title , Shell theory , Field theory , Chart of  Elements

Read the Newton's 300+ years question, posted on sci.astro, sci.physics, sci.philosophy.meta news groups at December 31, 1997.

Formulated for easy reading shell theory

This web site is designed to provoke dispute – and eventually convince you that it’s time to change our views.

Send me a letter